Open up: a survey on open and non-anonymized peer reviewing

Title: Open up: a survey on open and non-anonymized peer reviewing
Creator(s): Besançon, Lonni; Rönnberg, Niklas; Löwgren, Jonas; Tennant, Jonathan P.; Cooper, Matthew
Date: 2020
Is Part Of: Research Integrity and Peer Review
Volume: 5
Issue: 1
Pages: 8
Language: eng
ISSN: 2058-8615
Short Title: Open up
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-020-00094-z
Zotero BiDiAr: https://www.zotero.org/groups/5293298/bidiar/items/SZCGF3VJ/item-list
Abstract: Our aim is to highlight the benefits and limitations of open and non-anonymized peer review. Our argument is based on the literature and on responses to a survey on the reviewing process of alt.chi, a more or less open review track within the so-called Computer Human Interaction (CHI) conference, the predominant conference in the field of human-computer interaction. This track currently is the only implementation of an open peer review process in the field of human-computer interaction while, with the recent increase in interest in open scientific practices, open review is now being considered and used in other fields.

Filter by resource type and property:

Academic Article

DHeLO