{
    "o:id": 15431,
    "url": "https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/15431",
    "o:resource_template": "Academic Article",
    "o:resource_class": "bibo:AcademicArticle",
    "dcterms:title": [
        "Open up: a survey on open and non-anonymized peer reviewing"
    ],
    "dcterms:creator": [
        "Besançon, Lonni",
        "Rönnberg, Niklas",
        "Löwgren, Jonas",
        "Tennant, Jonathan P.",
        "Cooper, Matthew"
    ],
    "dcterms:date": [
        "2020"
    ],
    "dcterms:language": [
        "eng"
    ],
    "dcterms:abstract": [
        "Our aim is to highlight the benefits and limitations of open and non-anonymized peer review. Our argument is based on the literature and on responses to a survey on the reviewing process of alt.chi, a more or less open review track within the so-called Computer Human Interaction (CHI) conference, the predominant conference in the field of human-computer interaction. This track currently is the only implementation of an open peer review process in the field of human-computer interaction while, with the recent increase in interest in open scientific practices, open review is now being considered and used in other fields."
    ],
    "dcterms:isPartOf": [
        "Research Integrity and Peer Review"
    ],
    "bibo:doi": [
        "https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-020-00094-z"
    ],
    "bibo:issn": [
        "2058-8615"
    ],
    "bibo:issue": [
        "1"
    ],
    "bibo:pages": [
        "8"
    ],
    "bibo:shortTitle": [
        "Open up"
    ],
    "bibo:volume": [
        "5"
    ],
    "foaf:homepage": [
        "https://www.zotero.org/groups/5293298/bidiar/items/SZCGF3VJ/item-list"
    ]
},