id
	13592
Url
	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/13592
Resource template
	Academic Article
Resource class
	bibo:AcademicArticle
Title
	BIM and GIS integration: planning a digital approach to archaeological site management
Creator
	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/13767
	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/13766
	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/13765
	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/13764
	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/13763
	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/13762
	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/3288
Date
	2025
Language
	eng
Abstract
	The Pompeii Archaeological Park is an exceptional example of archaeology where architectural features have been almost totally preserved, in the context of an archaeological excavation. Because of this unique site, a digital management tool constructed upon the planned conservation needs, requires both the features of a BIM (Building Information Modelling) and a GIS (Geographic Information System). This article presents the first steps taken towards the design of such system, where the latest research in the integration of the two technological domains takes into consideration the requirements from the archeologists that will use the system. In particular, semantic mappings between entity classes are explained: the data schemas compared are the open format standards for BIM and GIS, namely IFC and CityGML, against a dedicated taxonomy created specifically for this research on the features of Vesuvian architecture.
Is Part Of
	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/2002
References
	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/13768
Spatial Coverage
	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/606
Bibliographic Citation
	https://www.zotero.org/groups/5293298/bidiar/collections/W7VU663H
Cites
	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/11527
	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/11648
	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/11081
	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/14643
	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/14109
	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/14644
	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/14645
	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/14646
	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/14647
	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/14648
	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/14649
	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/14650
	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/14651
	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/14652
	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/14653
	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/14654
	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/14655
	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/14656
Doi
	https://doi.org/10.19282/ac.36.1.2025.09
Issue
	1
Pages
	171-190
Uri
	https://www.archcalc.cnr.it/journal/articles/1382
Volume
	36
Homepage
	https://www.zotero.org/groups/5293298/bidiar/items/HYLZJXBJ/item-list
Tag
	Survey and excavations

--