{
    "o:id": 13371,
    "url": "https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/13371",
    "o:resource_template": "Academic Article",
    "o:resource_class": "bibo:AcademicArticle",
    "dcterms:title": [
        "From Hybridity to Entanglement, From Essentialism to Practice"
    ],
    "dcterms:creator": [
        "Stockhammer, Philipp Wolfgang"
    ],
    "dcterms:date": [
        "2013"
    ],
    "dcterms:language": [
        "eng"
    ],
    "dcterms:abstract": [
        "Hybridity and hybridization have recently become buzzwords in archaeological studies. In particular archaeologists working in the Mediterranean on Bronze Age networks of interaction (e.g. Feldman 2006; Knapp 2008, 2009, 2012; Steel 2002; Voskos and Knapp 2008), on Early Iron Age colonization (Antonaccio 2003, 2010; Dietler 2010; van Dommelen 2006; Hodos 2010; Vives-Ferrándiz Sánchez 2005, 2007, 2008) and on Romanization (van Dommelen and Terrenato 2007; Hodos 2006; Webster 2001) have found it a highly useful term to describe archaeological phenomena. Whereas Bhabha (2007) defined hybridity as a strategy of the suppressed and subaltern against their suppressors in a colonial context, archaeologists particularly perceive those objects as 'hybrid' which seem to resist classification within predefined taxonomies."
    ],
    "dcterms:isPartOf": [
        "Archaeological Review from Cambridge"
    ],
    "bibo:issue": [
        "1"
    ],
    "bibo:pages": [
        "11-28"
    ],
    "bibo:volume": [
        "28"
    ],
    "foaf:homepage": [
        "https://www.zotero.org/groups/5293298/bidiar/items/U8T6HQTR/item-list"
    ]
},