﻿id	Url	 Resource template 	 Resource class 	Title	Creator	Subject	Description	Publisher	Contributor	Date	Type	Format	Identifier	Language	Relation	Coverage	Rights	 Alternative Title 	Abstract	 Date Created 	 Date Issued 	 Date Modified 	Medium	 Is Replaced By 	Replaces	Requires	 Is Part Of 	 Has Part 	 Is Referenced By 	References	 Spatial Coverage 	 Temporal Coverage 	 Access Rights 	 Bibliographic Citation 	License	 Rights Holder 	 Cited by 	Cites	Editor	 List of editors 	Status	Doi	Identifier	Isbn	Issn	Issue	 Number of pages 	 Number of volumes 	Pages	 Short title 	Uri	Volume	Name	Surname	Homepage	 Funded by 	Account	Member	Status	Tag	Number	 Current Location 	 Is Shown At 	 Is Shown By 	 Europeana Rights 	 Europeana Type 	 Part of 	 Is supported by 	 Is supplied by 	Latitude	Longitude	Lat/long	 Has format 	 Operating systems 	 In series 
10492	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/10492	 Academic Article 	bibo:AcademicArticle	 Calcul et narrativé dans les publications archéologiques 	 Gardin, Jean-Claude 					1999				fra			 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.en CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 		 Archaeological publications raise problems of many sorts, currently discussed in connection with computer networks and other technologies. One of them, however, seems somewhat neglected, namely the fact that we are mostly unable to read more than a fraction of the articles and books published in our respective fields of research. The substitution of electronic to printed publications does not fully meet that challenge. Complementary measures are needed, taking into account an acknowledged reality: our works are for the most part consulted, not read. The schematisation of archaeological constructs developed in the logicist perspective is meant to facilitate consultations; it is related to the computational paradigm of the information age. As such, however, it fails to fulfil one of the functions of historical works, associated with the narrative mode of thought and discourse. This paper advocates a parallel development of the two genres in archaeology, one through electronic publications of a radically new form, the other through printed works explicitly conceived as literary versions or expansions of the former. 								https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/2002																						63–78		http://www.archcalc.cnr.it/journal/id.php?id=266	10			https://www.zotero.org/groups/5293298/bidiar/items/8YTURSUV/item-list																				
