{
    "o:id": 10395,
    "url": "https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/10395",
    "o:resource_template": "Academic Article",
    "o:resource_class": "bibo:AcademicArticle",
    "dcterms:title": [
        "An example of supervised classification in paleolithic archaeology"
    ],
    "dcterms:creator": [
        "Bietti, Amilcare 1937-2006",
        "Burani, Ambra",
        "Zampetti, Daniela"
    ],
    "dcterms:date": [
        "1992"
    ],
    "dcterms:language": [
        "eng"
    ],
    "dcterms:rights": [
        "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.en CC BY-NC-ND 4.0"
    ],
    "dcterms:abstract": [
        "As an example of pattern recognition problems in prehistory, the authors present two different kinds of classification (unsupervised and supervised) applied to a sample of common Upper Paleolithic tools: the end-scrapers of Grotta Polesini, coming from layer 1 and layer C12. The results, obtained through the use of statistical techniques, led to a general conclusion: in building a typology more attention should be given to functional considerations and to a deep understanding of behavioural patterns on a more local scale. The traditional prehistoric typological lists are therefore criticised, as they are often too general and too much oriented towards large scale comparisons in space and time."
    ],
    "dcterms:isPartOf": [
        "https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/2002"
    ],
    "bibo:pages": [
        "7-17"
    ],
    "bibo:uri": [
        "http://www.archcalc.cnr.it/journal/id.php?id=36"
    ],
    "bibo:volume": [
        "3"
    ],
    "foaf:homepage": [
        "https://www.zotero.org/groups/5293298/bidiar/items/CMUQJDM4/item-list"
    ]
},