{
    "o:id": 10308,
    "url": "https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/10308",
    "o:resource_template": "Academic Article",
    "o:resource_class": "bibo:AcademicArticle",
    "dcterms:title": [
        "Taxicab correspondence analysis of abundance data in archaeology: three case studies revisited"
    ],
    "dcterms:creator": [
        "Mallet Gauthier, Solène",
        "Choulakian, Vartan"
    ],
    "dcterms:date": [
        "2015"
    ],
    "dcterms:language": [
        "eng"
    ],
    "dcterms:rights": [
        "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.en CC BY-NC-ND 4.0"
    ],
    "dcterms:abstract": [
        "This paper compares the method of Correspondence Analysis (CA) for finding patterns in archaeological sites by artifacts abundance data, with a robust variant, named Taxicab Correspondence Analysis (TCA). We show that this comparison is useful, especially for sparse tables with outliers. We identify three kinds of outliers. Three well-known datasets are reanalyzed."
    ],
    "dcterms:isPartOf": [
        "https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/2002"
    ],
    "bibo:pages": [
        "77–94"
    ],
    "bibo:uri": [
        "http://www.archcalc.cnr.it/journal/id.php?id=784"
    ],
    "bibo:volume": [
        "26"
    ],
    "foaf:homepage": [
        "https://www.zotero.org/groups/5293298/bidiar/items/T4KM9VHD/item-list"
    ]
},