﻿id	Url	 Resource template 	 Resource class 	Title	Creator	Subject	Description	Publisher	Contributor	Date	Type	Format	Identifier	Language	Relation	Coverage	Rights	 Alternative Title 	Abstract	 Date Created 	 Date Issued 	 Date Modified 	Medium	 Is Replaced By 	Replaces	Requires	 Is Part Of 	 Has Part 	 Is Referenced By 	References	 Spatial Coverage 	 Temporal Coverage 	 Access Rights 	 Bibliographic Citation 	License	 Rights Holder 	 Cited by 	Cites	Editor	 List of editors 	Status	Doi	Identifier	Isbn	Issn	Issue	 Number of pages 	 Number of volumes 	Pages	 Short title 	Uri	Volume	Name	Surname	Homepage	 Funded by 	Account	Member	Status	Tag	Number	 Current Location 	 Is Shown At 	 Is Shown By 	 Europeana Rights 	 Europeana Type 	 Part of 	 Is supported by 	 Is supplied by 	Latitude	Longitude	Lat/long	 Has format 	 Operating systems 	 In series 
10221	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/10221	 Academic Article 	bibo:AcademicArticle	 GIS usage in Scandinavia 	 Madsen, Torsten 					1998				eng			 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.en CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 		 The use of GIS in Scandinavian archaeology is still limited. The current survey has revealed 18 projects, of which 12 are full research projects, four are Cultural Resource Management (CRM) projects and two are aimed at developing field methods. Minor projects based on the work of individuals prevail among the research projects, although at least one large-scale project is reported. Three of the four CRM projects are “flagships” for their country (Denmark, Norway and Sweden). The paper takes a critical attitude towards the current development in Scandinavian Archaeology, where an obvious disparity between administrative and research archaeology prevails. The way GIS is applied may be seen as a good example of what this disparity means. Large scale uses of GIS occur in the CRM context, but primarily not with a research aim. Ambitious research projects, on the other hand, are promoted by research institutions, but generally they appear impotent due to a lack of resources. Further, the paper focuses on demands for making GIS a success in archaeological research. Issues discussed here are: active research contributions from CRM units in the future; better access to digital map information for non-profit research projects; education, education and once more education of archaeologists. 								https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/2002																						169–189		http://www.archcalc.cnr.it/journal/id.php?id=252	9			https://www.zotero.org/groups/5293298/bidiar/items/6ZQDERAM/item-list																				
