id
	10152
Url
	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/10152
Resource template
	Academic Article
Resource class
	bibo:AcademicArticle
Title
	The good, the bad and the ugly: evaluating Open Science practices in archaeology
Creator
	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/12600
	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/12601
Date
	2024
Language
	eng
Rights
	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.en CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Abstract
	In the past decade, archaeology has witnessed a surge in digital data and methodologies made accessible through online repositories, databases, collaborative platforms like GitHub, and library collections. While this ‘digital revolution’ has lead to notable advancements in data accessibility and dissemination, it has also presented several challenges. These include developing effective data management strategies, defining scientific publication modalities, addressing ethical concerns regarding the protection of cultural heritage, and bridging the gap between rich and poor research institutions. Taking these challenges into account, this paper aims to outline best practices for data sharing, dissemination, and reproducibility in archaeology, underscoring their benefits to researchers and the wider public. Through a range of approaches and practical examples drawn from everyday research scenarios, we will demonstrate how these practices promote transparency and foster open science.
Is Part Of
	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/2002
References
	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/4928
	http://shinyserver.cfs.unipi.it:3838/C14/ NEONET
	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/4373
	https://core.tdar.org/ tDAR
	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/2082
Bibliographic Citation
	https://www.zotero.org/groups/5293298/bidiar/collections/PBXLHX8E
Cites
	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/10182
	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/11135
	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/12948
	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/12949
	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/12950
	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/12951
	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/12952
	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/12953
	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/12954
	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/12955
	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/12956
	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/12957
	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/11136
	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/12958
	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/12959
	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/12960
	https://chloe.cnr.it/s/BiDiAr/item/12961
Doi
	https://doi.org/10.19282/ac.35.2.2024.09
Issue
	2
Pages
	75-84
Uri
	https://www.archcalc.cnr.it/journal/articles/1329
Volume
	35
Homepage
	https://www.zotero.org/groups/5293298/bidiar/items/8QL6BMRE/item-list

--