Peer Community In Archaeology: a community-driven free and transparent system for preprints peer-reviewing
- Title
- Peer Community In Archaeology: a community-driven free and transparent system for preprints peer-reviewing
- Creator(s)
- Queffelec, Alain
- Maureille, Bruno
- Arzarello, Marta
- Blasco, Ruth
- Crandell, Otis
- Doyon, Luc
- Halcrow, Siân
- Karoune, Emma
- Ruiz-Redondo, Aitor
- Van Peer, Philip
- Date
- 2023
- Is Part Of
-
Archeologia e Calcolatori
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 125-134
- Language
- eng
- Rights
- CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
- Abstract
- The number of scientific articles published each year is on the rise, but the current system, which is dominated by a few for-profit publishers, has become prohibitively expensive for many institutions. This model of publishing is increasingly being criticized for its serious flaws. The deposit of preprints in open archives is a solution for the rapid dissemination of research. However, the quality of these preprints must be ensured. This is where Peer Community In (PCI) comes in, by organizing communities of researchers to assess the quality of the work deposited in open archives. In 2020, a PCI dedicated to Archaeology was established, with over 100 archaeologists acting as recommenders. These recommenders handle the submitted preprints as associate editors would in traditional journals, but at the end of the process, they write a recommendation text, and the entire editorial process is published with it. So far, PCI Archaeology has received 45 submissions, mostly pertaining to Prehistoric periods, and from authors located in different regions of the world. This open process has been widely accepted by reviewers, but there is still a need to promote the use of preprints in the community of archaeologists.
- Cites
- Peer reviewers unmasked: largest global survey reveals trends
- The pricing of open access journals: Diverse niches and sources of value in academic publishing
- Accelerating scientific publication in biology
- Time to stop the exploitation of free academic labour
- The Rise of Platinum Open Access Journals with Both Impact Factors and Zero Article Processing Charges
- The preregistration revolution
- A manifesto for reproducible science
- What is open peer review? A systematic review
- The Global Burden of Journal Peer Review in the Biomedical Literature: Strong Imbalance in the Collective Enterprise
- Pride and prejudice – What can we learn from peer review?
- The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era
- Open-access publishing fees deter researchers in the global south
- Replacing academic journals
- Deal or No Deal | Periodicals Price Survey 2019 | Library Journal
- Open up: a survey on open and non-anonymized peer reviewing
- Over-optimization of academic publishing metrics: observing Goodhart’s Law in action
- The past, present and future of Registered Reports
- Registered Reports: A new publishing initiative at Cortex
- Growth rates of modern science: a latent piecewise growth curve approach to model publication numbers from established and new literature databases
- OA Diamond Journals Study. Part 2: Recommendations
- A billion-dollar donation: estimating the cost of researchers’ time spent on peer review
- A Practical Guide to Preprints: Accelerating Scholarly Communication
- Scientific Journal Publications: On the Role of Electronic Preprint Exchange in the Distribution of Scientific Literature
- Current market rates for scholarly publishing services
- Science of science
- The preprint dilemma
- Open Science in Archaeology
- Revealing reviewers’ identities as part of open peer review and analysis of the review reports
- Peer Community In: A free process for the recommendation of unpublished scientific papers based on peer review
- Introducing Preregistration of Research Design to Archaeology
- Open access: The true cost of science publishing
- Why is access to the scholarly journal literature so expensive?
- Removing Barriers to Reproducible Research in Archaeology
Export
Position: 5865 (4 views)